We were some of the first food bloggers to suggest that we hold ourselves to a code of “journalistic” ethics. Our call for responsible online publishing hit a nerve. While many praised our declaration of a code, others openly reviled us for our lengthy manifesto that encouraged applying traditional journalism’s ethical principles to the wily world of online food writing.  We were called fascists, dictators, and gutsy visionaries.

After spending much time responding to debate and comment, we decided to leave our manifesto to speak for itself. We saw our statement of fundamental principles as something that’s unchanging, and did not necessitate constant updates every couple of days.

It is important, however, to stay current. So for that reason, we believe it’s time to make a few adjustments to our manifesto.

1. We added “commenters” to our manifesto because, like bloggers and websites, people who write comments publish their opinions and should be aware that they are accountable for their actions. And based on the rapid increase of hateful and threatening comments on the internet, we think it’s important that even the anonymous individuals who sling abuse realize that they will be held accountable for their threats by organizations far more powerful than ethically minded individuals.

2. We’re gonna keep it short this time.

FOOD BLOG CODE OF ETHICS 2.0

1. We understand that the moment we put anything up on the internet (a blog, restaurant reviews, recipes, videos, photography, and comments) we automatically become a publisher and therefore have the responsibility of a publisher.
2. We accept the responsibilities that come with publishing. We will be accountable for our actions.
3. We will be civil.
4. We will be transparent. We will disclose gifts, comps, samples, and financial relationships with specific businesses if we write about them.
5. We will not steal other people’s work. Other peoples’ content (writing, recipes, photos, video, illustrations) will not be taken or used without written or verbal consent from the creator of said material. If we use someone else’s material and change it for our own use (i.e. a recipe) we will give attribution to the original resource.

When we first decided to write our statement of purpose nine months ago—for the sake of being clear on what we stood for in online writing—the topic of ethics in the blogosphere was something that was whispered between online writers. Many had opinions, but few were willing to publish their thoughts on the matter. So, when we decided it was time we write out our five-point manifesto on food blog ethics, our words and point of view caused a lot of controversy. We were shocked at how many people got engaged (and enraged) and suddenly everyone was talking about ethics. In a time when most people were interested in new iPhone apps and the birth of Twitter, we were ecstatic that we were surrounded by people arguing about philosophy. Getting people to think about the effect of their words before they hit PUBLISH was our goal.

So it was with great pleasure that we discovered Food Ethics was mentioned by Robert Seitsema, the author and food critic for the Village Voice in his comprehensive Columbia Journalism Review article, “Everyone Eats…But that doesn’t make you a restaurant critic”. In it, he masterfully charts the history of restaurant reviewing in the United States since the 1970′s and the effect of a handful of people on food writing.

Between mentions of the monumental effect of Criag Claiborne’s reviewers guidelines on food reviewing, how Gael Green’s sexy prose and memoir-style forever changed food writing and how Ruth Reichl shook up reviewing when she made her reviews a “bona fide literary form”—there was a full paragraph dedicated to our Leah and I and our blog, Food Ethics.

According to Seitsema, Craig Claiborne’s “procedural framework” for restaurant reviewing set the stage for generations of food writers and our blog FoodEthics “hedged on many of Claiborne’s principles, but sought to partly maintain them.”

“In the half century since Craig Claiborne developed his reviewing system, the nation’s attitude toward food has changed profoundly. Eating in restaurants has gone from being an infrequent occurrence for most people to being a primary form of entertainment. The marketplace is filled with new food, more food, and more-expensive food, and eating has become a preoccupation for the millions who consider themselves foodies. Many patrons no longer want to become regulars at one or two restaurants—they’d rather sample the vast smorgasbord the city offers, and many consider being the first to reach a new place a preferment. This behavior is creating a boom-and-bust cycle for restaurants, in which novelty and buzz is valued above excellence.”

Thanks to technology and the speed of doing business, things are changing fast. But amongst all of this transformation, Sietsema points out, there still remains a need to maintain ethical guidelines in food writing. Claiborne’s reviewing structure that he created decades ago still remains important to mainstream media. As citizen journalists flood the internet every time they press “publish”, the future of online writing lays in the hands of every man. Progress is important. But it’s integral that we remember the lessons of the past.

If you have a blog, where do you stand now about this issue? Considering that once you hit publish you become a citizen journalist, do you believe you should follow a journalistic code when it comes to reviewing products or businesses?

Blogging Gets Its Hand Slapped

But the biggest change came in October 2009, when the Federal Trade Commission decided it was time to update its rules regarding endorsements and testimonials, a document written long before online content existed, let alone required regulation. With print magazines and newspapers failing left and right and untraditional marketing opportunities springing up on blogs and in social media, the Federal Trade Commission realized it was time to create clear guidelines for businesses looking to establish relationships with online publishers.

“Endorsements in print ads or on television are clear, because it is obviously the company’s advertisement,’’ says Mary Engle, the FTC’s associate director of consumer protection. “It became very clear to us when we began our regular periodic review of guides in 2007 that because of all the social media going on we’d need to update them.’’

According to the FTC’s updated stance: bloggers, Twitterers and other online reviewers are now required to disclose their “material connection” with corporate sponsors or advertisers.  As of December 1, 2009, businesses are now legally required to disclose gifts or payments to bloggers and other online writers, to subsidize posts dedicated to their product(s). The FTC also updated its endorsement and testimonial rules, now holding celebrity endorsers liable for false statements about a product. Each infringement of these rules will cost the guilty party (i.e. the business) $11,000.

Some bloggers rejoiced at the announcement by the FTC, while others openly dismissed the ruling as heavy-handed and unfair. Some bloggers feared prosecution while others adapted their practice of accepting gifts and payments to include a small disclaimer at the end or beginning of their post to protect themselves. Meanwhile, other bloggers refuse to share any information about gifts and payments with their readers.

It seems that bloggers agree to disagree: there’s a wide range of what’s reasonable when it comes to ethics and rules within online publishing.

What About FBCE?

While we continue to Tweet when new information comes up, we haven’t been hammering away at this blog because it was initially intended as a statement, and it quickly took on a life of it’s own. Here’s a quick summary of what’s gone on since the last time we posted:

• When we started the discussion with our blog, we offered to create a badge that offered readers a visual statement that showed that their blog upheld five basic ethical standards in blogging, a long, carefully thought out statement that blogger “Chef John” of Food Wishes quickly summed up quite simply:

Food Blogger Code of Ethics:

*As re-interpreted by Chef John of Food Wishes

1. Don’t Be an Asshole

2. Don’t Make Shit Up

3. Ask Before You Use Someone Else’s Stuff

4. Dude, Karma

• We received a lot of concerned responses from people that believed that a badge was dangerous, that it would insinuate that any blog that didn’t have it wasn’t ethical. That wasn’t our intention. Instead, we hoped that the badge would be a simple, voluntary way for bloggers to say, “hey, I follow these guidelines;” but it seemed fraught. In the end, we decided against creating a badge, feeling that the conversation about ethics was ultimately the more important point.
• In the Spring, the UK Guardian wrote about the Food Blog Code of Ethics. Later the Guardian admitted that their tone about our Code was a bit “smug,” if not full of “snorts of derision” for the idea that British food bloggers be required to have such equally high standards. And then, in the summer, The Guardian suggested that perhaps they were in fact in need of a structured conversation between PR companies and food bloggers in order to come up with some sort of guidelines. How the British food blogging panel panned out still remains uncertain.
• In July of 2009, a group called Blog With Integrity, created a site that gave bloggers a badge that communicated a commitment to specific business practices of full disclosure, attribution and upholding journalistic standards. While this group of four bloggers encourage bloggers to contact them via email with suggestions and comments, for better or for worse, they haven’t opened their site up to users interested in engaging in a public debate (via comments). Instead, the women behind Blog With Integrity speak about the subject at conferences and with the  press.

• We weighed in on the topic of ethics in the blogging world with KPCC and the LA Times. Along the way—both on this site via comments and in the real world–we’ve been applauded for taking a stand by bloggers, restaurant professionals and food writers. We’ve also been called “crotchety” by one blogger for believing in a code of ethics, and “fascists” by another angry commenter. All in all, by putting this site together and taking part in a discussion that turned into something much bigger and more philosophical than we ever expected, the feedback we’ve received has been enlightening. To say the least.

We’re happy to have been part of the discussion. It’s one that continues to evolve as blogging becomes increasingly more popular and businesses learn new ways to reach out to customers through online marketing. We look forward to seeing how this debate changes in 2010 and will weigh in again when it does.

In response to your query, generally it’s wise to always seek permission from the copyright holder if the image in question doesn’t have a license attached describing permissible uses (eg a Creative Commons type license).

Of course, depending on the type of use being made, the reproduction of a photograph without permission could be a “fair use” under the copyright law, particularly if no commercial use is being made of it and it is not interfering with a market for the photograph – which may well be the case on many blogs.  Thus, the otherwise potentially infringing use could be excused under the fair use doctrine.

It is important to recognize that the question of attribution is a separate question to copyright infringement.  While you should always attribute the source of a picture, copyright infringement is a separate question and you can infringe copyright even if you give appropriate attribution.  While many copyright holders will only ask for attribution in return for permission to use the picture, it is NOT a general rule of copyright law that if you give appropriate attribution, you have not infringed copyright.  Copyright law deals with acts of copying or displaying a picture, not how it is attributed.

We live in exciting, dynamic times. Print media—newspapers and magazines—are struggling to hold on in an environment where the immediacy and accessibility of the web has broad appeal. This is particularly true in the world of food writing.

Professional journalists, amateur food writers and gastro-diarists alike have embraced the blog as an effective, informal format to reach hungry readers or, simply, to share their experiences. What makes food blogging so exciting is that it makes it just as possible that a reader could enjoy the gustatory musings of a mom in the mid-west as the hard reporting of a writer on the city food beat. The web is like a great big dinner party and everyone is invited.

Welcome to the party
The funny thing about that dinner party metaphor is how true it is. When you invite a diverse group of people to a party, some of them get along, some of them don’t, some of them gossip and some of them spend the entire evening trying to introduce people to others who they think share common ideals. And there’s always one or two, who quietly stand in the corner with a glass of wine taking it all in.

To continue on this metaphorical path without getting all Emily Post on you, we feel there’s a basic standard of etiquette that most people who attend social gatherings ascribe to, or at least know of and choose to ignore. We wrote the Food Blog Code of Ethics after many heated conversations with fellow food bloggers. Those discussions inspired us to lay down some basic guidelines for food writing on the Internet because we couldn’t find any that already existed. These aren’t laws that we expect everyone to follow. These aren’t rules you have to accept as your own. We know they don’t apply to everybody. They’re a jumping off point to start a bigger discussion.

With that said, we are so excited about the thoughtful comments posted here and around the web about this topic. Not everyone agrees with The Code and that’s cool. We’re just glad to know people are thinking about what their blogs mean—to themselves and their readers—and what they’re trying to put out into the world. Because, let’s face it folks, you may not consider yourself a writer, but when you’re publishing a blog for the world to see—you are.

We’ve spent the past few days synthesizing all of the feedback we’ve gotten, and we realize that there are a couple of things that we need to clarify:

Review Guidelines
When it comes to criticism, our ideas behind The Code are two-fold. Up front, we don’t think people, whether they write for magazines or newspapers or blogs or Yelp, should use their publication or site’s name to intimidate or blackmail. We don’t think all reviews should be positive by any stretch—solid criticism elevates the discourse about good food and good products and is necessary. But, when reviewers abuse their power, they give critics as a whole a bad name and undermine potentially valid criticisms.

This leads us to our second point. If readers are going to rely on the reviews they find on the web, to decide which restaurants they are going to go to or what products they’ll buy, they need to trust the authors. Like with any good business, transparency and accountability is the key to that trust.

Do I really need to visit a restaurant more than once to be part of The Code?
Though we understand that going to a restaurant more than once isn’t always possible, we do believe that the idea of going multiple times should be considered. Could the experience you had be the result of a fluke bad night? Were you so hungry by the time you arrived that you would have been grateful for anything you put in your mouth? Or, conversely, that you were so hungry, no length of time waiting for your food to come out would have been tolerable? These are questions that all reviewers can ask themselves.

So when we talk about going to restaurants multiple times in the code, we realize that it’s an ideal. Some people are writing about restaurants that they go to in their travels, and most of us don’t have the money to go to places more than once (and find it especially hard to cough up the extra dough if a place stinks the first time we go). The code suggests that if you only go to a restaurant once, say so. We have updated the code to try and clarify this point.

Amendments
We recognize the potential need for the code to be dynamic in order for it to reflect the changing world of online media and the growing discussion about blogging ethics. While we don’t anticipate substantive changes to The Code, if we clarify or augment the document, we’ll be sure to notify those people on the blogroll by email, giving them an opportunity to weigh in or opt out if they no longer agree (thanks kitchenhacker.net).

Do I have to be a journalist to follow the code?
Hell no! (But thanks for asking.) The great thing about the blogosphere is that you don’t have to be a journalist to publish your work in a worldwide forum. In fact, one of the reasons we started this was because we understand that plenty of bloggers don’t have journalism backgrounds and probably weren’t aware of some of the guidelines about image, recipe and quote usage and attribution. The Internet is filled with talented people who put a lot of hard work into their craft, we just want to make sure that work is protected and respected.

Recipe attribution
Do’h. We left that very important element out of the code in our effort to publish this document in a timely manner (thanks Bowl of Plenty). We’ve updated the code.

Prohibitionists! Don’t tell us what we can or can’t say!
Wow, we were surprised by how many people actually thought our Code was intended to limit food bloggers’ freedom of speech. Let us repeat: The Code is not intended to limit anyone’s freedom of speech. We offer these pages to advocate accountability, accuracy and honesty in the world of food blogging. The Code is designed as a set of guidelines, not a punishable set of laws.

Photography
We’ve gotten lots of questions and comments about how the usage of photos fits into The Code. In a perfect world, if you didn’t take the photo yourself, you would ask the photographer for permission to use it. Even if you haven’t asked for permission, you should include a caption that attributes the source. If you’re using stock photography, check the company’s rules regarding giving credit. You should probably attribute anyway, but in this case you are paying for the right to use the stock photo. *We are currently seeking advice for how this should be worded.

Anonymity
This is a big issue and one that is wonderfully complicated. Again, The Code doesn’t require people to reveal their identity on their blog; it suggests writing as if one’s identity was known. The idea here being, that you might say things under the veil of anonymity that you wouldn’t if you put your name to it. It all comes back to accountability. We’ll update The Code to try to make this more clear.

On the other hand, reviewers should always try to be anonymous when reviewing a restaurant. While it’s not always possible (did we mention the picture of S. Irene Virbila that circulates through L.A.’s restaurants?) it’s encouraged. Anonymous reviewers are best able to convey the experience of the average diner, and provide the closest approximation of objectivity that a reviewer expressing opinion can offer.

The Badge
We’ve decided to hold off on putting the badge out for now. We’re conflicted about the negative message the badge might convey. Please send us your feedback on the subject. If you’d like to be included on the “We the People” page, please shoot us an email at foodblogethics at gmail dot com.

If you would like more information about why we wrote The Code, feel free to visit our food blogs and search for the words “food blog ethics.”

We believe it is important for the reputation of food blogs that we hold ourselves to higher standards of conduct when reviewing the culinary media, food industry and its products.

Food Blog Restaurant Review Guidelines

1. We will be thorough.

• We will consult the Association of Food Journalist guidelines to maintain a standard for reviews.

2. We will be fair when reviewing a restaurant

• We will do our best to visit a restaurant more than once before passing a final judgment.

• We will do our best to sample a full range of items on menu.

• We will be fair to new restaurants. If we post about a new restaurant we will tell our readers about our initial impressions. If possible, we will wait at least one month after the restaurant opens, allowing them to work out some kinks, before writing a full-fledged review.

• If we receive an item for free or if we are recognized during our reviewing process, we will mention so in our review.

• While anonymity is important when dining out and conducting a review, we will not hide behind a pseudonym. If complete anonymity is required for personal or professional safety, we will not post anything that we wouldn’t feel comfortable putting our name on and owning up to.

1. We will be accountable

• We will write about the culinary world with the care of a professional. We will not use the power of our blog as a weapon. We will stand behind our claims. If what we say or show could potentially affect someone’s reputation or livelihood, we will post with the utmost thought and due diligence.
• We will not hide behind total anonymity. Even if we choose to write anonymously for our own personal or professional safety, we will not post anything that we wouldn’t feel comfortable putting our name on and owning up to.
• If we review a restaurant, product or culinary resource we will hold ourselves to a standard set of guidelines as offered by the Association of Food Journalists.

2. We will be civil

• We whole-heartedly believe in freedom of speech, but we also acknowledge that our experiences with food are subjective. We promise to be mindful, regardless of how passionate we are. We will be forthright, but will refrain from personal attacks.

3. We will reveal bias

• If we are writing about something or someone we are emotionally connected to, we will be up front about it.

4. We will disclose gifts, comps and samples

• When something is given to us or offered at a deep discount because of our blog, we will disclose that information. As bloggers, most of us do not have the budgets of large publications, and we recognize the value of samples, review copies of books, donated giveaway items and culinary event, but it’s import to disclose freebies to avoid accusations of conflicts of interest.

5. We will follow the rules of good journalism

• We will not plagiarize or use images from others without attribution. We will research. We will attribute quotes and offer link backs to original sources whenever possible. We will do our best to make sure that the information we are posting about is accurate. We will factcheck. In other words, we will practice good journalism.

As the blogging world expands exponentially, more and more people in the culinary world believe that food bloggers—as a group—are unfair, highly critical, untrained and power hungry individuals empowered by anonymity. As writers, trained journalists and food bloggers, we feel it is unfair to be labeled something we aren’t. By creating a food blogger code of ethics, we hope to elevate our craft and draw attention to the food bloggers who hold themselves to higher standards.

Why should I subscribe to the ideas of The Code?

We believe you should be able to write about your experiences as you wish. We know everyone’s truth is different and we thoroughly appreciate the diversity of opinions within the food blogging realm. We are not against free speech. We do not believe in censoring. We do, however, believe in civility, honesty and truth.

We strive to make our blogs stand out from the rest through our writing and story telling. We created The Code because we felt it was important to define what our ethical standards were and clearly state them so that we could hold ourselves to those standards.  The Code is not meant to be a mandatory thing for everyone in the blogosphere. This is our way to define what our standards are.

We are proud to be bloggers and hope to give the blogging community a better reputation. We wrote this because we were concerned that food bloggers were being unfairly judged as hacks, which the majority of us are not – with or without journalism degrees. And that by creating a code of conduct should give us MORE freedom to be honest, not less.

Who we are

The Food Blog Code of Ethics was written collaboratively by  Brooke Burton and Leah Greenstein. We are also food writers and the people behind the food blogs SpicySaltySweet.com and FoodWoolf.com.If you believe its important to hold your food blog to a higher code and want to be listed here as someone that follows these guidelines, please contact us at foodblogethics at gmail.